News Desk, Kolkata :
Kolkata High Court Challenges Madhyamik Exam Time Change ;
In a surprising turn of events, the announcement of a new exam schedule just days before the commencement has sparked a legal battle in the Kolkata High Court. The madhyamik Education Board released a notification, shifting the exam start time from 12 PM to 9:45 AM, setting the stage for a courtroom showdown. Chief Justice Biswajit Basu raised questions about the rationale behind the sudden change, challenging the authorities to justify their decision.
Justice Basu, in a stern rebuke, stated, “The timing alteration may not be logical, but changing it now could create new complications and further confusion.” While he questioned the necessity of the modification, he refrained from intervening, expressing concerns about potentially adding more confusion for the candidates.
Unyielding in their stance, the state argued that the decision was prompted by traffic congestion issues. Justice Basu, unmoved by the explanation, retorted, “This abrupt realization—why now? Such frivolous reasoning is guiding your decisions.” He cautioned against hasty modifications and criticized the authorities for burdening students with unnecessary uncertainties.
In response to the legal tussle, the state has announced the establishment of a control room starting January 30th. Each district will now have a control room at the district magistrate’s office, SDM office, and police station. Justice Basu emphasized the need for effective communication and directed the state to publicize the details to ensure maximum awareness among the students and guardians.
Furthermore, Justice Basu advised the state to activate a helpline from this Friday, allowing students facing difficulties reaching exam centers to seek assistance. The police will be deployed to escort them to their respective schools, ensuring a smooth examination process. Justice Basu sternly reminded the state, “This lack of foresight in planning is unacceptable. There is no justification for such incompetence.”
The courtroom drama took a compelling turn when Justice Basu questioned the state, “Why was this change made just 15 days before the exams? What led to this sudden realization?” The state responded vaguely, citing road congestion as the primary factor. Justice Basu, unimpressed, remarked, “This seems like a hasty decision without proper evaluation. Such baseless decisions undermine your credibility.”
The legal battle has not only unveiled the underlying issues but has also prompted Justice Basu to issue a directive to initiate a helpline starting this Friday. This helpline will serve as a lifeline for students facing challenges in reaching exam centers due to the abrupt change. Justice Basu emphasized that the police would be actively involved in coordinating transportation for these students, ensuring they face minimal disruptions.
The courtroom spectacle reached its climax when Justice Basu expressed his dismay, stating, “These decisions lack responsibility and sound judgment. They cannot be endorsed in any way.” His scathing critique of the state’s actions underscores the urgency for a more thoughtful and student-centric approach in managing such crucial matters.
As the legal battle unfolds, the state is now compelled to reevaluate its decision-making process and address the concerns raised by Justice Basu. The fate of thousands of students hangs in the balance, and the High Court’s intervention serves as a beacon of hope for those caught in the crossfire of bureaucratic decisions.
In the wake of this legal showdown, the state’s education board faces not only judicial scrutiny but also public backlash. The palpable tension surrounding the exam schedule has sparked widespread debate and calls for greater transparency and accountability in decision-making.
The courtroom drama serves as a stark reminder of the impact administrative decisions can have on the lives of students. Justice Basu’s unwavering commitment to ensuring a fair and just resolution highlights the importance of upholding the integrity of the examination process.
In conclusion, the Madhyamik Education Board’s last-minute decision has not only ignited a legal battle but has also exposed the fragility of administrative processes. As the state grapples with the fallout, students and parents anxiously await a resolution that prioritizes their well-being and upholds the sanctity of the examination system. Justice Basu’s words echo in the corridors of the courtroom, demanding accountability and a reevaluation of the decision-making that has thrown the education system into disarray.
DISCLAIMER
Our news media denounces any form of bias and disapproves of sensationalism. The disseminated news is entirely educational and aimed at social awareness. Our media maintains absolute impartiality, adhering solely to the purpose of education and social consciousness.
